Annals of Physics

Volume 276, Issue 2, 15 September 1999, Pages 321-360

Cover image

Regular Article

The Saddle-Point Method for Condensed Bose Gases

Author links open the overlay panel. Numbers correspond to the affiliation list which can be exposed by using the show more link.
Martin Holthaus , Eva Kalinowski
Fachbereich Physik, Philipps-Universität, Renthof 6, D-35032, Marburg, Germanyf1E-mail: holthaus@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.def1

Received 1 March 1999, Available online 2 April 2002

doi:10.1006/aphy.1999.5950

Get rights and content

Abstract

The application of the conventional saddle-point approximation to condensed Bose gases is thwarted by the approach of the saddle-point to the ground-state singularity of the grand canonical partition function. We develop and test a variant of the saddle-point method which takes proper care of this complication, and provides accurate, flexible, and computationally efficient access to both canonical and microcanonical statistics. Remarkably, the error committed when naively employing the conventional approximation in the condensate regime turns out to be universal, that is, independent of the system's single-particle spectrum. The new scheme is able to cover all temperatures, including the critical temperature interval that marks the onset of Bose–Einstein condensation, and reveals in analytical detail how this onset leads to sharp features in gases with a fixed number of particles. In particular, within the canonical ensemble the crossover from the high-temperature asymptotics to the condensate regime occurs in an error-function-like manner; this error function reduces to a step function when the particle number becomes large. Our saddle-point formulas for occupation numbers and their fluctuations, verified by numerical calculations, clearly bring out the special role played by the ground state.
Download full text in PDF

References

    REFERENCES

  • 1 

    C.G. Darwin, R.H. Fowler

    Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 21 (1923), p. 391

  • 2 

    E. Schrödinger

    Statistical Thermodynamics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1946)

  • 3 

    K. Huang

    Statistical Mechanics, Wiley, New York/London (1963)

  • 4 

    R.K. Pathria

    Statistical Mechanics, Pergamon, Oxford (1985)

  • 5 

    G. Schubert

    Z. Naturforsch., 1 (1946), p. 113

  • 6 

    I. Fujiwara, D. ter Haar, H. Wergeland

    J. Stat. Phys., 2 (1970), p. 329

  • 7 

    R.M. Ziff, G.E. Uhlenbeck, M. Kac

    Phys. Rep., 32 (1977), p. 169

    Article PDF (5004K)

  • 8 

    M. Gajda, K. Rzażewski

    Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 (1997), p. 2686

  • 9 

    S. Grossmann, M. Holthaus

    Phys. Rev. Lett., 79 (1997), p. 3557

  • 10 

    R.B. Dingle

    Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation, Academic Press, New York/London (1973)

  • 11 

    R. B. Dingle, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45, 1949, 275.

  • 12 

    A.R. Fraser

    Phil. Mag., 42 (1951), p. 165

  • 13 

    P. Navez, D. Bitouk, M. Gajda, Z. Idziaszek, K. Rzażewski

    Phys. Rev. Lett., 79 (1997), p. 1789

  • 14 

    M. Fierz

    Helv. Phys. Acta, 29 (1956), p. 47

  • 15 

    M. Holthaus, E. Kalinowski, K. Kirsten

    Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 270 (1998), p. 198

    Article PDF (371K)

  • 16 

    F. London

    Phys. Rev., 54 (1938), p. 947

  • 17 

    S.R. de Groot, G.J. Hooyman, C.A. ten Seldam

    Proc. R. Soc. London A, 203 (1950), p. 266

  • 18 

    S. Grossmann, M. Holthaus

    Opt. Express, 1 (1997), p. 262

  • 19 

    C. Weiss, M. Wilkens

    Opt. Express, 1 (1997), p. 272

  • 20 

    E.T. Whittaker, G.N. Watson

    A Course of Modern Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1962)

  • 21 

    I.M. Ryshik, I.S. Gradstein

    Tables of Series, Products, and Integrals, VEB, Berlin (1963)

  • 22 

    M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun

    Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York (1972)

  • 23 

    P.T. Landsberg

    Thermodynamics, Interscience, New York (1961)

  • 24 

    P. Borrmann, G. Franke

    J. Chem. Phys., 98 (1993), p. 2484

  • 25 

    F. Brosens, J.T. Devreese, L.F. Lemmens

    Solid State Comm., 100 (1996), p. 123

    Article PDF (484K)

  • 26 

    N.L. Balazs, T. Bergeman

    Phys. Rev. A, 58 (1998), p. 2359

  • 27 

    F.C. Auluck, D.S. Kothari

    Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 42 (1946), p. 272

  • 28 

    M. Toda, R. Kubo, N. Saitô

    Statistical Physics I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1992)

  • 29 

    J.M. Vogels, C.C. Tsai, R.S. Freeland, S.J.J.M.F. Kokkelmans, B.J. Verhaar, D.J. Heinzen

    Phys. Rev. A, 56 (1997), p. R1067

  • 30 

    S. Inouye, M.R. Andrews, J. Stenger, H.-J. Miesner, D.M. Stamper-Kurn, W. Ketterle

    Nature, 392 (1998), p. 151

  • 31 

    D.G. Fried, T.C. Killian, L. Willmann, D. Landhuis, S.C. Moss, D. Kleppner, T.J. Greytack

    Phys. Rev. Lett., 81 (1998), p. 3811

  • 32 

    M.J. Jamieson, A. Dalgarno, M. Kimura

    Phys. Rev. A, 51 (1995), p. 2626

  • 33 

    S. Giorgini, L.P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari

    Phys. Rev. Lett., 80 (1998), p. 5040

  • 34 

    R. Graham

    Phys. Rev. Lett., 81 (1998), p. 5262

  • 35 

    W. Ketterle

    McGraw–Hill 1999 Yearbook of Science & Technology, McGraw–Hill, New York (1998) p. 43

open in overlay

*
Current address: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Sektion Physik, Theresienstrasse 37, D-80333 München, Germany.
f1
E-mail: holthaus@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de

Copyright © 1999 Academic Press. All rights reserved.