Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
corner
corner
Access provided through the subscription of Staats- und Universitaetsbibliothek Bremen - Mobile Active! (Details)

Phys. Rev. E 86, 036104 (2012) [17 pages]

View this article on our new beta website

Try it!

Taxonomies of networks from community structure

Download: PDF (2,135 kB) Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Jukka-Pekka Onnela1,2,3,4,*, Daniel J. Fenn4,5,*, Stephen Reid3, Mason A. Porter4,6, Peter J. Mucha7, Mark D. Fricker4,8, and Nick S. Jones3,4,9,10
1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
2Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
3Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
4CABDyN Complexity Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, United Kingdom
5Mathematical and Computational Finance Group, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, United Kingdom
6Oxford Centre for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, OX1 3LB, United Kingdom
7Carolina Center for Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics and Institute for Advanced Materials, Nanoscience & Technology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
8Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom
9Oxford Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
10Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

Received 30 November 2011; published 10 September 2012

CHORUS Article part of CHORUS Pilot

The study of networks has become a substantial interdisciplinary endeavor that encompasses myriad disciplines in the natural, social, and information sciences. Here we introduce a framework for constructing taxonomies of networks based on their structural similarities. These networks can arise from any of numerous sources: They can be empirical or synthetic, they can arise from multiple realizations of a single process (either empirical or synthetic), they can represent entirely different systems in different disciplines, etc. Because mesoscopic properties of networks are hypothesized to be important for network function, we base our comparisons on summaries of network community structures. Although we use a specific method for uncovering network communities, much of the introduced framework is independent of that choice. After introducing the framework, we apply it to construct a taxonomy for 746 networks and demonstrate that our approach usefully identifies similar networks. We also construct taxonomies within individual categories of networks, and we thereby expose nontrivial structure. For example, we create taxonomies for similarity networks constructed from both political voting data and financial data. We also construct network taxonomies to compare the social structures of 100 Facebook networks and the growth structures produced by different types of fungi.

©2012 American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036104
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036104
PACS:
89.75.Hc

*These authors contributed equally to this work.