Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets


Abstract

Proto-organisms probably were randomly aggregated nets of chemical reactions. The hypothesis that contemporary organisms are also randomly constructed molecular automata is examined by modeling the gene as a binary (on-off) device and studying the behavior of large, randomly constructed nets of these binary “genes”. The results suggest that, if each “gene” is directly affected by two or three other “genes”, then such random nets: behave with great order and stability; undergo behavior cycles whose length predicts cell replication time as a function of the number of genes per cell; possess different modes of behavior whose number per net predicts roughly the number of cell types in an organism as a function of its number of genes; and under the stimulus of noise are capable of differentiating directly from any mode of behavior to at most a few other modes of behavior. Cellular differentation is modeled as a Markov chain among the modes of behavior of a genetic net. The possibility of a general theory of metabolic behavior is suggested.

References

    • Altman and Dittmer, 1962
    • P.L. Altman, D.S. Dittmer
    • Growth (1962)

    • Apter, 1966
    • M.J. Apter
    • Cybernetics and Development

    • Pergamon Press, Oxford (1966)

    • Bonner, 1965
    • J.F. Bonner
    • The Molecular Biology of Development

    • Oxford University Press, London (1965)

    • Borradaile et al., 1958
    • L.A. Borradaile, F.A. Potts, L.L.S. Eastham, J.T. Saunders
    • The Invertebrata

    • (3rd ed)Cambridge University Press (1958)

    • Bretscher, 1967
    • M.S. Bretscher
    • Nature, Lond, 217 (1967), p. 509

    • Cleaver, 1967
    • J.E. Cleaver
    • Thymidine Metabolism and Cell Kinetics

    • North Holland, Amsterdam (1967)

    • Goodwin, 1963
    • B.C. Goodwin
    • Temporal Organization in Cells

    • Academic Press, London (1963)

    • Grobstein, 1959
    • C. Grobstein
    • The Cell, Vol. I.Academic Press, London (1959), p. 437

    • |
    • Horowitz and Metzenberg, 1965
    • N.H. Horowitz, R.L. Metzenberg
    • Ann. Rev. Biochem, 34 (1965), p. 527

    • Jacob and Monod, 1963
    • F. Jacob, J. Monod
    • 21st Symp. Soc. Study of Development and Growth, Academic Press, London (1963)

    • Mirsky and Osawa, 1961
    • A.E. Mirsky, S. Osawa
    • The Cell, Vol. IIAcademic Press, New York (1961), p. 677

    • |
    • Nanney and Rudzinska, 1960
    • D.L. Nanney, M.A. Rudzinska
    • The Cell, Vol. IVAcademic Press, New York (1960), p. 109

    • Rubin and Sitgreave, 1954
    • H. Rubin, R. Sitgreave
    • Probability Distributions Related to Random Transformations on a Finite Set

    • Tech. Report No. 19A, Appl. Maths. and Stats. LabStanford University (1954)

    • Schrodinger, 1944
    • E. Schrodinger
    • What is Life?

    • Cambridge University Press (1944)

    • Slone, 1967
    • N.J.H. Slone
    • Lengths of Cycle Time in Random Neural Networks

    • Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1967)

    • Sparrow and Evans, 1961
    • A.H. Sparrow, H.J. Evans
    • Brookhaven Symp. Biol, 14 (1961), p. 76

    • Sugita, 1963
    • M. Sugita
    • J. Theoret. Biol, 4 (1963), p. 179

    • Van't Hof, 1965
    • J. Van't Hof
    • Expl. Cell Res, 37 (1965), p. 420

    • Van't Hof and Sparrow, 1963
    • J. Van't Hof, A.H. Sparrow
    • Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A, 49 (1963), p. 897

    • Vendrely, 1955
    • R. Vendrely
    • The Nucleic Acids, Vol. IIAcademic Press, New York (1955), p. 155

    • Walker and Ashby, 1965
    • C.C. Walker, W.R. Ashby
    • Kybernetics, 3 (1965), p. 100

    • Walter et al., 1967
    • C. Walter, R. Parker, M. Ycas
    • J. Theoret. Biol, 15 (1967), p. 208

    • Watson, 1965
    • J.D. Watson
    • Molecular Biology of the Gene

    • W. A. Benjamin, Inc, New York (1965)

    • Williamson, 1964
    • D.H. Williamson
    • E. Zeuthen (Ed.), Synchrony in Cell Division and Growth, Wiley, New York (1964), p. 351

Present address: Cincinnati General Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.