1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
f
Communities in multislice voting networks
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article

Abstract

There is no abstract available for this article.

Communities in multislice voting networks

    Peter J. Mucha 1; Mason A. Porter 2
    1: 1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA; 2: 2University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3LB, United Kingdom
 

Network representations can be used to study numerous complex systems. in networks consist of sets of nodes that are relatively densely connected to each other. 1,2 Recently, we have developed a community detection method for (multiplex, multiscale, and/or time-dependent) networks in which we optimize a single quality function that generalizes modularity using an appropriate null model. 3 Multislice networks are described by stacks of adjacency matrices (slices), where each slice represents a single set of connections between nodes (e.g., at a specified time in longitudinal data). Here, each slice quantifies voting similarities between U.S. Senators in a two-year Congress. 4 Any Senator appearing in successive Congresses is assigned an interslice connection of selected strength between these instances (with the same value for each individual).

The figures indicate multislice community structure at three values of interslice coupling strength. Each appearance of a Senator in a Congress is shown by a dot placed horizontally in time and vertically by the represented state and is assigned to a community (which is indicated by color). Larger values of interslice coupling strength encourage common community assignment of the same Senator across Congresses. We detected communities using a Louvain method 5 with a multislice null model and subsequent Kernighan–Lin node swaps. 6

Communities identify party-like groups in voting (cf. the nominal party affiliations in each community; see the figures). Transitions arise amidst the simultaneous appearance of three communities and in conjunction with historically important periods (e.g., Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, Civil War, Great Depression, and Civil Rights Era). The middle figure identifies the Civil Rights Era as the most significant political transition—with respect to community assignments—since the Civil War. Except for the major shock of the Civil War, a robust two-party system with drifting labels appears at large coupling: Pro-Administration (PA), Federalist (F), Anti-Jackson (AJ), Adams (A), Whig (W), and Republican (R) Senators on one side and Anti-Administration (AA), Democratic-Republican (DR), Jackson (J), and Democrat (D) Senators on the other. 7

 

This work was supported by the NSF (Grant No. DMS-0645369: P.J.M.) and the James S. McDonnell Foundation (Grant No. 220020177: M.A.P.).

 
  1. M. A. Porter, J. -P. Onnela, and P. J. Mucha,   56, 1082 (2009).
  2. S. Fortunato,   486, 75 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
  3. P. J. Mucha, T. Richardson, K. Macon, M. A. Porter, and J. -P. Onnela,   328, 876 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1184819
  4. A. S. Waugh, L. Pei, J. H. Fowler, P. J. Mucha, and M. A. Porter, e-print arXiv:0907.3509.
  5. V. D. Blondel, J. -L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre,   2008, 10008 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  6. M. E. J. Newman,   74, 036104 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036104
  7. We are grateful to our co-authors of Ref. 3, on which the present calculations were based. We obtained the Congressional roll call data from voteview.com.
 
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Communities in multislice voting networks
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/chaos/20/4/10.1063/1.3518696
10.1063/1.3518696
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM