10.1145/956750.956769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedings
Article

Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network

Published:24 August 2003

ABSTRACT

Models for the processes by which ideas and influence propagate through a social network have been studied in a number of domains, including the diffusion of medical and technological innovations, the sudden and widespread adoption of various strategies in game-theoretic settings, and the effects of "word of mouth" in the promotion of new products. Recently, motivated by the design of viral marketing strategies, Domingos and Richardson posed a fundamental algorithmic problem for such social network processes: if we can try to convince a subset of individuals to adopt a new product or innovation, and the goal is to trigger a large cascade of further adoptions, which set of individuals should we target?We consider this problem in several of the most widely studied models in social network analysis. The optimization problem of selecting the most influential nodes is NP-hard here, and we provide the first provable approximation guarantees for efficient algorithms. Using an analysis framework based on submodular functions, we show that a natural greedy strategy obtains a solution that is provably within 63% of optimal for several classes of models; our framework suggests a general approach for reasoning about the performance guarantees of algorithms for these types of influence problems in social networks.We also provide computational experiments on large collaboration networks, showing that in addition to their provable guarantees, our approximation algorithms significantly out-perform node-selection heuristics based on the well-studied notions of degree centrality and distance centrality from the field of social networks.

References

  1. R. Albert, H. Jeong, A. Barabasi. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406(2000), 378--382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. C. Asavathiratham, S. Roy, B. Lesieutre, G. Verghese. The Influence Model. IEEE Control Systems, Dec. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Asavathiratham. The Influence Model: A Tractable Representation for the Dynamics of Networked Markov Chains. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Bass. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science 15(1969), 215--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Berger. Dynamic Monopolies of Constant Size. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B 83(2001), 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Blume. The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction. Games and Economic Behavior 5(1993), 387--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Brown, P. Reinegen. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 14:3(1987), 350--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Coleman, H. Menzel, E. Katz. Medical Innovations: A Diffusion Study Bobbs Merrill, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Cornejols, M. Fisher, G. Nemhauser. Location of Bank Accounts to Optimize Float. Management Science, 23(1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Domingos, M. Richardson. Mining the Network Value of Customers. Seventh International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Durrett. Lecture Notes on Particle Systems and Percolation. Wadsworth Publishing, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Ellison. Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination. Econometrica 61:5(1993), 1047--1071.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Goldenberg, B. Libai, E. Muller. Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth. Marketing Letters 12:3(2001), 211--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Goldenberg, B. Libai, E. Muller. Using Complex Systems Analysis to Advance Marketing Theory Development. Academy of Marketing Science Review 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83(6):1420--1443, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. V. Harinarayan, A. Rajaraman, J. Ullman. Implementing Data Cubes Efficiently. Proc. ACM SIGMOD 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. M. Liggett. Interacting Particle Systems. Springer, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Macy, Chains of Cooperation: Threshold Effects in Collective Action. American Sociological Review 56(1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Macy, R. Willer. From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling. Ann. Rev. Soc. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. V. Mahajan, E. Muller, F. Bass. New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research. Journal of Marketing 54:1(1990) pp. 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. Morris. Contagion. Review of Economic Studies 67(2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Nemhauser, L. Wolsey. Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. John Wiley, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. G. Nemhauser, L. Wolsey, M. Fisher. An analysis of the approximations for maximizing submodular set functions. Mathematical Programming, 14(1978), 265--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Newman. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98(2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Peleg. Local Majority Voting, Small Coalitions, and Controlling Monopolies in Graphs: A Review. 3rd Colloq. on Structural Information and Communication, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Richardson, P. Domingos. Mining Knowledge-Sharing Sites for Viral Marketing. Eighth Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. E. Rogers. Diffusion of innovations Free Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. T. Schelling. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. T. Valente. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Hampton Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Wasserman, K. Faust. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. D. Watts. A Simple Model of Global Cascades in Random Networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(2002), 5766--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. H. Peyton Young. The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 02-04-018(2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. H. Peyton Young. Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network

    Comments

    About Cookies On This Site

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

    Learn more

    Got it!