Nonparametric Bayesian inference of the microcanonical stochastic block model

Tiago P. Peixoto
Phys. Rev. E 95, 012317 – Published 17 January 2017

Abstract

A principled approach to characterize the hidden structure of networks is to formulate generative models and then infer their parameters from data. When the desired structure is composed of modules or “communities,” a suitable choice for this task is the stochastic block model (SBM), where nodes are divided into groups, and the placement of edges is conditioned on the group memberships. Here, we present a nonparametric Bayesian method to infer the modular structure of empirical networks, including the number of modules and their hierarchical organization. We focus on a microcanonical variant of the SBM, where the structure is imposed via hard constraints, i.e., the generated networks are not allowed to violate the patterns imposed by the model. We show how this simple model variation allows simultaneously for two important improvements over more traditional inference approaches: (1) deeper Bayesian hierarchies, with noninformative priors replaced by sequences of priors and hyperpriors, which not only remove limitations that seriously degrade the inference on large networks but also reveal structures at multiple scales; (2) a very efficient inference algorithm that scales well not only for networks with a large number of nodes and edges but also with an unlimited number of modules. We show also how this approach can be used to sample modular hierarchies from the posterior distribution, as well as to perform model selection. We discuss and analyze the differences between sampling from the posterior and simply finding the single parameter estimate that maximizes it. Furthermore, we expose a direct equivalence between our microcanonical approach and alternative derivations based on the canonical SBM.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 20 October 2016
  • Corrected 20 January 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.012317

©2017 American Physical Society

Erratum

Authors & Affiliations

Tiago P. Peixoto*

  • Department of Mathematical Sciences and Centre for Networks and Collective Behaviour, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom and ISI Foundation, Via Alassio 11/c, 10126 Torino, Italy

  • *t.peixoto@bath.ac.uk

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 95, Iss. 1 — January 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Announcement
Physical Review E Scope Description to Include Biological Physics
January 14, 2016

The editors of Physical Review E are pleased to announce that the journal’s stated scope has been expanded to explicitly include the term “Biological Physics.”

Editorial
From the APS Editor in Chief
February 3, 2017

The journals of the American Physical Society welcome and will continue to welcome manuscripts from all countries, with publication based on scientific merit alone.

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

1 of 9
×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×